Wednesday, 28 November 2012
Bedtime story
Friday, 23 November 2012
Understanding Climate Change
According
to an American national study conducted by researchers at Yale University found
that only 57 % of the population know what the greenhouse effect is and only 45
% understand that carbon dioxide traps heat from the Earth’s surface. Americans
recognize their limited understanding where only 1 in 10 say that they are
“very well informed” about climate change, and 75 % say they would like to know
more about climate change (Science Daily, 2010).
A survey
conducted on the public understanding of climate change and global warming on
residents in the south of England show a tendency for the public to detach
themselves from the causes, impacts and responsibility for tackling climate
change/global warming (Whitmarsh, 2009). The public lack individual engagement
in tackling the issue of climate change by distancing themselves from the
issue, despite understand it is happening (Sharples, 2010).
The complexity
of the science behind climate change contributes to the public pushing the
responsibility away. It is therefore thought-provoking that experts believe the
information about climate change is sufficient and appropriate (Sharples, 2010).
There is a need for a better communication pathway between the experts and the
public.
It is
essential for the climate community to take advantage of the opportunities in
the social media when informing the public about climate change as the media
heavily influences the public’s opinion on the topic. Events like
24 Hours of Reality are ideal in creating publicity and spreading knowledge
about climate change.
The video
below is an ideal example of a good way for scientists to inform the public
about climate change. The information is communicated in a simple, fast technique
contributing to making the concept of global warming easy for the public to
grasp.
I believe a fast and improved adaptiation to social media is necessary for the scientific community to increase the public's awareness and engagement in the fight against climate change.
Thursday, 15 November 2012
24 HOURS OF REALITY- The Dirty Weather Report
24 Hours of
Reality- The Dirty Weather Report is a an event taking place over 24 hours from
the 14th to the 15th of November, putting a spotlight on climate change in every
region of the world. Broadcasting live on the Internet; featuring news, voices
and multimedia content experts, musicians, comedians and citizens share their
stories about climate change impacts.
The event
is launched by the Climate Reality Project, lead by the Chairman, former Vice
President Al Gore (The Climate Change Project, 2012).
The Climate
Reality Project’s Message: ”We can solve the climate crisis, we need leadership
to implement solutions today.”
Watch the live stream here: http://climaterealityproject.org/
During
these 24 hours, you are asked to sign a pledge and join a global movement to
demand action.
Signing the
pledge will help spread the truth about climate change and put pressure on the
world leaders to guide us towards a clean energy future.
Take the pledge here: http://climaterealityproject.org/pledge/
Friday, 9 November 2012
I BIKE CPH
In
continuation of my latest blog post, one of the four targeted areas in the CPH
2025 Climate Plan is mobility, aiming to make cycling, walking or public
transport the preferable transport forms when getting around the city. I will in
the following blog post focus on biking and on the specific goals and
initiatives Copenhagen has made to reach each the goals set for 2025. I will
thereafter evaluate if it is realistic for other cities to adapt these goals.
Copenhagen
is a world-class city for cyclists but their ambitions are higher and new initiatives
are required to reach the major goal of 2025:
For 50 % of
trips to work or school in Copenhagen to be by bike (35 % today).
Reaching
this goal will lead to reducing the annual carbon emission by 40,000 ton CO2
compared with 2010 (The City of Copenhagen, 2012).
To reach
these goals concrete initiatives include:
- Travel time- Establishing Superhighways, short cuts, routes with Green Waves for bikers.
- Safety- Green bicycle routes, redesign of intersection, wider bicycle lanes, safer school routes and campaigns for the general bicycle attitude and consideration.
- Comfort- Improved asphalt and snow clearance on cycle tracks, services (air pumps, apps e.g.) and effective bicycle parking.
- Lifestyle and image- Campaigns marketing the health associated with cycling and specific efforts for groups with potential for more cycling (e.g. newcomers).
The Municipality
of Copenhagen expect total costsof approximately 56 million British pounds to
reach the goals set in the CPH 2025 Climate Plan. In addition to the
initiatives tied with the CPH 2025 Climate Plan the city will have expenses of
approximately 100 million British pounds to develop the bicycle city further (The City of Copenhagen, 2011).
One of the
great strengths of the bike culture in Copenhagen is that biking is nothing
special; people choose to bike simply because it is practical, fast and
cheap. In other countries biking is more
of a subculture, requiring special clothes, extreme bikes etc. For cultures to
adapt Copenhagen’s bicycle goals and ambitions the general bike mentality will
need to change. None the less, Copenhagen’s bicycle plans can inspire cities
and be a role model for other cities.
Wednesday, 7 November 2012
Copenhagen: The First CO2 Neutral Capital
On August
23rd 2012 the City Council of Copenhagen adopted the CPH 2025 Climate Plan, a
plan to show the route to a CO2 neutral Copenhagen. Carbon
neutrality will be reached when Copenhagen’s carbon net emissions equals zero. This means Copenhagen will have to reduce their
carbon emissions to a minimum, and compensate the remaining emissions with
external initiatives. The CPH
2025 Climate Plan has been divided into four areas: energy consumption, energy
production, mobility and the city administration. In the plan specific goals
and initiatives within each area are described for how the goal of carbon
neutrality can be reached. Through close cooperation between governments,
businesses, knowledge institutions and Copenhageners the holistic plan is
working for a better quality of life, innovation, job creation and investment
(City of Copenhagen, 2012).
The
government has been criticised for failing to introduce a promised congestion
charge for Copenhagen, which would potentially have increased the use of public transport for the
city’s commuters (Stanners, 2012).
An article
written by Rasmus Skov Olesen for Baggrund
(a Danish contemporary online magazine), the method used in calculating
the Copenhagen's carbon emission is criticised. Today the city’s emission is calculated only from the
direct carbon emissions of the area. This means there is a weighted focus on
the emissions associated with traffic congestion and the energy sector. This
calculation fails to include the citizen’s environmental liability associated
with indirect emissions e.g. the emissions associated with travel and
consumption. NIRAS (a large multidisciplinary consultancy company) mean the
method for measuring carbon emission is incorrect, giving a distorted
perception of reality amongst the citizens, where the world’s environmental and
climate problems are being solved from above.
The problem is it is not popular to discuss behavioural changes and
reduction in public consumption, as it is often associated with a welfare loss
(Olesen, 2012). By including the indirect emissions, Copenhagen will need to
give more responsibility to the citizens forcing them to change their
comfortable lifestyle in order to meet the 2025 goals.
Regardless,
as a capital city and a metropolis, Copenhagen is taking responsibility for
climate change. Let us hope the initiatives will inspire other cities to do the
same.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)